Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Convention Center, Exhibit Hall BC, Second Floor
José Luis Costa1, Tomas Gowland2, Nahuel Peralta3, Hernán Angelini4, Virginia C. Aparicio5 and Karina Zelaya4, (1)Department of Agronomy, EEA-INTA Balcarce, Balcarce, Argentina
(2)Mar y Sierras, CREA, Tandil, Argentina
(3)Agronomy, CONICET, Balcarce, Argentina
(4)Agronomy, INTA, Balcarce, Argentina
(5)INTA, Balcarce, Argentina
The introduction of
variable rate application technology and grain yield monitors has greatly
increased farmer interest in varying input rates to match crop productivity.
The use of yield monitors allows producers the opportunity to evaluate the
effects of varying input rates on grain yield and ultimately profit. Specific recommendations for variable rate
nitrogen (VRN) fertilization in wheat are required to realize the potential
environmental and economic benefits of this technology. A one-year study was conducted
in a farm fields (45 ha.)
that were subdivided into 42 blocks of 150 x 100 m. Each block was divided
into three plots and three N fertilizer rates were randomized within these
blocks (0, 50, and 100 kg
N ha-1). Nitrogen was measured at each plot at 60 cm depth. The depth to a petro-calcic horizon
(DPH) was measured at a grid of 30 m. Apparent soil
electrical conductivity at 30 cm depth (ECa) observations
were collected in the winter of 2008 using a Veris® 3100 in rows of 20 m. The field was planted
with wheat in July 2008 and harvest in December 2008. Yield monitor data for
each field were accessed from the farmer who has collaborated with INTA in this
research from 2003 to 2008. Data were interpolated using kriging
via the Surfer software. These
interpolated files, where each observation represented a 100 m2 area were sorted by ranks of the
average normalized yield from the period 2002/08 and the mean value
calculated. Those average values were analyzed
by correlation studies. Normalized yield means were
negatively correlated with ECa (R2
= 0.867) and positively correlated with the depth DPH
(R2 = 0.866). The values of DPH were
grouped into three depth ranges (60 to 100, 100 to 120, and 120 to 140 cm). An analysis of variance was performed to check
the response to N application in each of these ranges. In the range of DPH from
60 to 100 cm
were significant differences among the three N rates, instead in the range of DPH
from 100 to 120 and 120 to 140cm was only found significant differences between
doses and the check.