Abstract:
The AFI conceptually describes any agri-environmental context in terms of three policy concerns (natural resources, biodiversity and landscape) that are addressable within three distinct management domains (crop and animal husbandry, physical farm infrastructure and (‘non-productive’) natural and cultural heritage). The resulting nine-dimensional matrix accommodates two essential building blocks of the AFI: an assessment criteria matrix and a subsequently derived indicator matrix.
The feasibility of the AFI method was tested in 15 European farming contexts. In
Customised forms of the AFI for these contrasting contexts were created through an interactive process with stakeholders. Assessment criteria were largely defined on the basis of specified REPS objectives and contractual obligations, and appropriate indicators for evaluation of the specified criteria selected accordingly. Transformation functions were developed to map all indicator values onto a common scoring scale (0 to 10). Indicator functions integrating multiple indicator values into one indicator score were developed when a simple statistic was considered too simplistic. Technical specialists ensured the coherent structure and realistic quantification of such functions.
Stakeholders also assisted in weighting the perceived relative importance of the hierarchical index components (individual indicators within each matrix dimension, management domains and policy concerns). The AFI is calculated as a weighted sum of scores aggregated at each hierarchical level of the index. The presentation will illustrate how environmental benefits and costs to society were quantified while applying the AFI to the Irish cases.