321-7 Relative Location of Strips Influences Sweet Corn Yields, Potentially Leachable Nitrate, and Trace Gas Flux Under Strip Tillage.

Poster Number 2438

See more from this Division: S11 Soils & Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: S11 General Soils & Environmental Quality: Greenhouse Gaseous Emissions From Soil
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Duke Energy Convention Center, Exhibit Hall AB, Level 1
Share |

Erin R. Haramoto1, Daniel Brainard1, Sieglinde Snapp2 and Kevin Kahmark3, (1)Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
(2)W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI
(3)W.K Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI
Poster Presentation
  • Haramoto 2012 trisocieties final.pdf (631.5 kB)
  • Strip tillage (ST) is a form of conservation tillage in which strips are tilled only where the crop will be planted; the rest of the soil remains undisturbed.  When continuous ST is used, the relative location of strips from one year to the next may entail pest, crop, and soil management tradeoffs.  A field experiment was conducted to examine the impacts of strip placement on sweet corn (‘Luscious’) yield, potentially leachable nitrate (NO3-), and flux of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2).  Three treatments were examined in a field that had been in ST cabbage the previous year: 1) conventional (full-width) tillage (CT); 2) ST with the strips located in the same position as the previous year (STsame); and 3) ST with the strips offset from their previous year’s position (STdiff).  N fertilizer applications were banded 15 cm deep in rows (IR) in ST treatments, and surface broadcast and incorporated in CT treatment.  Deep soil cores (1 m) were collected in September 2011 and April 2012, cut into 20 cm sections, and analyzed for NO3-.  Trace gas flux was measured approximately weekly using a static chamber method; chambers were located IR and between crop rows (BR).  Sweet corn yield was highest in the STdiff treatment and was lowest following CT; yield in STsame was intermediate.  Soil NO3- was similar at all depths in all treatments in September 2011, but more soil NO3- was found at the 80-100 cm depth in the CT treatment in April 2012.  This suggests that greater amounts of NO3- may be lost to leaching in CT compared to ST, though residual NO3was low in all treatments.  N2O flux was greater IR than BR in all treatments.  CO2 flux in both BR and IR was similar in all treatments.  Results from these experiments demonstrate that yields can be maintained or improved with ST and that the N losses to the environment may be lessened by adopting ST with deep N banding.
    See more from this Division: S11 Soils & Environmental Quality
    See more from this Session: S11 General Soils & Environmental Quality: Greenhouse Gaseous Emissions From Soil
    << Previous Abstract | Next Abstract