393-16 Optimizing Seed Quality and Net Returns Through Enhanced N Management Strategies for Winter Wheat Production in the Canadian Prairies.

Poster Number 1507

See more from this Division: S04 Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Management
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Duke Energy Convention Center, Exhibit Hall AB, Level 1
Share |

Brian Beres1, Byron Irvine2, John O'Donovan3, Kenneth Harker3, Eric N. Johnson4, Stu Brandt5, Cindy Grant2, Henry Janzen1, Thomas Turkington3 and Craig Stevenson6, (1)Sustainable Production Systems, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
(2)Sustainable Production Systems, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon, MB, Canada
(3)Sustainable Production Systems, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada
(4)Scott Research Farm, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Scott, SK, Canada
(5)Sustainable Production Systems, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Scott, SK, Canada
(6)Consultant, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Poster Presentation
  • 2012_10_POS3_ASA-CSSA-SSSA MeetingBeresB_kg.pdf (1.6 MB)
  • This project was designed to provide information about the efficiency of nitrogen (N) management practices for western Canadian winter wheat producers.  Three factors were included in Experiment 1: 1) urea type (urea, urea+urease inhibitor -‘Agrotain’; urea+urease and denitrification inhibitor – ‘SuperU’, polymer-coated urea – ‘ESN’, and urea ammonium nitrate - UAN), 2) application method (fall side-band vs. spring broadcast vs. 50% side-band: 50% spring broadcast), and 3) Cultivar ('AC Radiant' hard red winter wheat vs. 'CDC Ptarmigan' soft white winter wheat).  The ‘Agrotain’ and 'CDC Ptarmigan' treatments were removed in Experiment 2 to allow for additional application methods: 1) fall side-band, 2) 50% side-band:50% late fall broadcast, 3) 50% side-band:50% early-spring broadcast, 4) 50% side-band:50% mid-spring broadcast, 5) 50% side-band:50% late-spring broadcast.  'CDC Ptarmigan' produced more grain but lower protein content than 'AC Radiant' and was superior for nitrogen utilization.  Grain yield and protein content were influenced by N form and application method.  Split applications of N almost always provided maximum yield and protein, particularly with ‘Agrotain’ or ‘SuperU’. In terms of yield, the UAN form, the 'ESN' form when all broadcast in spring or all side-banded in fall, and the fall-broadcasting method were inferior.  An exception to the poor fall-application results was observed in the 'SuperU' treatments, which produced similar yield to the highest-yielding treatments.  The results suggest split applications of N may be most efficient for yield and protein optimization when combined with a controlled release urea product, particularly with urease or urease+denitrification inhibitors, and if the majority of N is applied in spring.  The overall poor performance of UAN in this study warrants consideration of an N stabilizer to mitigate the apparent losses that caused low protein and yield.
    See more from this Division: S04 Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
    See more from this Session: Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Management