230-3 Quantifying Current and Future CO2 Fluxes Using Daycent and PEST Models from a Marginal Land Seeded to Switchgrass Production in South Dakota.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Climatology & ModelingSee more from this Session: Climatology & Modeling: I
Tuesday, November 4, 2014: 8:30 AM
Long Beach Convention Center, Room 203B
More accurate measurements and prediction of CO2 fluxes are important factors for greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation strategies. However, it is practically difficult to monitor CO2 fluxes from different environmental conditions. Therefore, process-based models have been used to estimate GHG fluxes, and for developing mitigation strategies. In this study, DAYCENT, a process-based ecosystem model, was used for simulating CO2 from switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) seeded to a marginal land previously used for cropland in South Dakota. The parameter estimation (PEST), an automatic calibration method, was used to calibrate the DAYCENT model. Data show that PEST significantly improved DAYCENT model estimations of CO2 fluxes with a modeling efficiency (ME) of 0.66. The PEST-DAYCENT modeled CO2 fluxes matched measured data reasonably well with a coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.67, RSR (ratio of RMSE to SD) value of 0.58, and percent bias (PBIAS) value of 1.32%. Further, the calibrated model was used to predict CO2 fluxes for future 2011 through 2095 based on changing temperature values from 0.1 to 3°C and precipitation changes from ±30%. Furthermore, we compared future CO2 fluxes based on temperature changes under wet to drought conditions and precipitation changes under increase of 3°C temperature to normal current weather condition. This study concluded that (i) PEST can effectively improve DAYCENT model’s calibration using measured CO2 fluxes; (ii) soil surface CO2 fluxes showed an increased trend from 2011 to 2095 with mean of 3426.6 kg ha-1 yr-1; (iii) temperature changes under normal and wet conditions showed a positive linear impact on CO2 fluxes, whereas, precipitation changes could slightly and non-monotonically impacted increased soil CO2 fluxes under normal temperature.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Climatology & ModelingSee more from this Session: Climatology & Modeling: I
Previous Abstract
|
Next Abstract >>