258-15 Integrating Biorefinery and Farm Biogeochemical Cycles Offsets Fossil Energy and Mitigates Soil Carbon Losses.

Poster Number 416

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Agriculture and Land Management Impacts on Soil Carbon Processes: II (includes student competition)
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Long Beach Convention Center, Exhibit Hall ABC
Share |

Paul R. Adler1, James G. Mitchell2, Ghasideh Pourhashem2, Sabrina Spatari2, Steve DelGrosso3 and William J Parton4, (1)Pasture Systems & Watershed Mgmt Research Unit, USDA-ARS Pasture Systems & Watershed Mgmt Research Unit, University Park, PA
(2)Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
(3)USDA/ARS, Fort Collins, CO
(4)Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Crop residues are potentially significant sources of feedstock for biofuel production in the US. However there are concerns with maintaining the environmental functions of these residues while also serving as a feedstock for biofuel production. Maintaining soil organic carbon (SOC) along with its functional benefits is considered a greater constraint than maintaining soil erosion losses to an acceptable level. In this paper we use the biogeochemical model DayCent to evaluate the effect of residue removal, corn stover and wheat and barley straw, in three diverse locations in the US. We evaluated residue removal with and without N replacement, along with application of a high-lignin fermentation byproduct (HLFB), the residue by-product comprised of lignin and small quantities of nutrients from cellulosic ethanol production.  The SOC always decreased with residue harvest, but the decrease was greater in colder climates when expressed on a life cycle basis. The effect of residue harvest on soil N2O emissions varied with N addition and climate. With N addition, N2O emissions always increased but the increase was greater in colder climates, while without N addition, N2O emissions increased in colder and decreased in warmer climates with crop residue harvest. Although SOC was lower with residue harvest when HLFB was used for power production instead of being applied to land, the avoidance of fossil fuel emissions to the atmosphere by utilizing crop residue to produce ethanol (offsets) reduced the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions since most of this residue carbon would normally be lost during microbial respiration. Therefore by returning the high lignin fraction of crop residue to the land after production of ethanol at the biorefinery, soil carbon levels could be maintained along with the functional benefit of increased mineralized N, and more GHG emissions could be offset compared to leaving the crop residues on the land.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Agriculture and Land Management Impacts on Soil Carbon Processes: II (includes student competition)