411-3 A Bog By Any Other Name: Do All ‘Bogs' Have Similar Anaerobic Carbon Dynamics?.
See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Forest, Range & Wildland SoilsSee more from this Session: Symposium--Belowground Biogeochemical Processes in Forested Wetlands
Net CH4 emissions were highest in BLF and S1 but very low in Zim where isotopic evidence demonstrates that methane oxidation was important. Porewater CH4 concentrations were similar at all sites, but isotopic data suggest that acetoclastic methanogenesis was important in the surface of BLF while hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis dominated throughout the soil profiles at S1 and Zim. Rates of CH4 production measured in July of 2013 decreased with depth in S1 hollows and BLF but were very low at all depths in S1 hummocks and Zim soils. Potential CH4 production measured over 6 months in laboratory incubations showed that surface soils from Zim produced comparable CH4 to other sites. Chemical characterization of DOM and solid peat generally indicated that S1 and Zim were similar at a particular depth and could not explain differences in CH4 production potentials.
There were no differences in mcrA gene or transcript abundance among sites, but the mcrA transcript-to-gene ratio was highest in S1, in concordance with its high CH4 production potential. Surface peat pmoA gene and transcript abundances were much higher in Zim and BLF compared to S1, and the transcript-to-gene ratio was highest in Zim, supporting an interpretation of high CH4 oxidation at that site.
Our results indicate substantial differences in anaerobic carbon cycling in these three peatlands despite them all having low pH and being covered by Sphagnum mosses.
See more from this Session: Symposium--Belowground Biogeochemical Processes in Forested Wetlands