250-3 A Nonpoint Source Nitrogen Reduction Plan for Minnesota Surface Waters.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Progress on the Mississippi River Nutrient Reduction Strategy: I
Tuesday, November 4, 2014: 1:30 PM
Long Beach Convention Center, Room 202B
Share |

David J. Mulla, 1991 Upper Buford, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, William Lazarus, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN and Dave Wall, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, MN
Minnesota’s surface water resources (including the Mississippi River) are threatened by nitrate contamination. Minnesota recently completed a comprehensive study of nitrogen sources and pathways for water pollution.  Nitrogen inputs to land surfaces are dominated by soil mineralization  and agricultural fertilizer.  A model was developed to estimate nitrate-N losses to surface waters.  This model was based on export coefficients for forested and urban lands, as well as experimental data for different cropping systems collected at numerous locations throughout Minnesota at sites receiving a wide range of N fertilizer and rates of precipitation/irrigation. Total nonpoint source N loadings to Minnesota surface waters were estimated at 254 million lb during an average climatic year.  This is about 6% of the total inputs of N on all Minnesota cropland.  A Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Tool based on the baseline N sources and pathways described above was subsequently developed for estimating N reductions to surface waters and associated costs when combinations of BMPs are adopted on suitable acres.  The Tool can be used to optimize selection of nine different agricultural “Best Management Practices” (BMPs) for reducing the N load from the highest contributing sources and pathways in a watershed.  The most cost-effective BMPs include optimizing rates of N fertilizer and manure on corn, shifting fall-applied N fertilizer applications to preplant spring applications or a split preplant-sidedress application, controlled drainage and wetland treatments.  Costs increase substantially with BMPs that take cropland out of production, such as riparian buffers and perennial crops.  A statewide analysis indicates that a combination of fertilizer and tile drain BMPs could reduce N loadings to surface waters in an average year by 20% at reasonable cost, but achieving higher reductions quickly becomes very expensive because of the need to change from row crops to less profitable crops.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Progress on the Mississippi River Nutrient Reduction Strategy: I