239-4 Estimation of Leaf Dry Weight Using Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Continuous Wavelet Analysis for Wheat Canopies.
Poster Number 230
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Climatology & ModelingSee more from this Session: Airborne and Satellite Remote Sensing: II
The results showed that among the different spectral indices, DSI (R1688, R922) was the best for monitoring LDW in wheat (R2 = 0.730, RMSE = 0.0266 kg/m2, RRMSE = 0.224). A systematic study using 108 wavelet functions from 15 wavelet families showed db3, db4, db6, db7, db8, db16, db17, db20, sym3, and gaus3 performed better; whereas, shan1-1, fbsp1-1-1.5, fbsp2-1-1, cmor1-1, cmor-1.5, cgau4, cgau5, cgau6, cgau7, and cgau8 performed slightly worse. The db7 (1197 nm, scale 8) was the best for monitoring LDW (R2 = 0.747, RMSE = 0.032 kg/m2, RRMSE = 0.272). Both VI and CWA can be used to estimate LDW in wheat in the NIR region (780 ~ 1,350 nm) with better performance for CWA than that for VIs. The results demonstrate that the newly developed LDW model on the method of VI and CWA could improve the performance of LDW estimation under different ecological site sand varied nitrogen treatments, while providing the theoretical basis of monitoring crop growth by hyperspectrum.
Key words: Wheat; Hyperspectrum; LDW; Vegetation index; Continuous wavelet transform; Monitor model
See more from this Session: Airborne and Satellite Remote Sensing: II