414-5 Assessing Crop Residue Phosphorus Speciation Using Chemical Fractionation and Solution 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management & Soil & Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Nutrient Management & Soil & Plant Analysis: II
Wednesday, November 5, 2014: 9:00 AM
Hyatt Regency Long Beach, Beacon Ballroom A
Share |

Sarah Noack, Hart Field Site Group, Clare, Australia, Ronald Smernik, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, Australia, Therese McBeath, CSIRO Agriculture, Canberra, Australia, Roger Armstrong, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Horsham, Australia and Michael J. McLaughlin, The University of Adelaide/CSIRO, Glen Osmond, Australia
At physiological maturity, nutrients in crop residues can be released to the soil where they are incorporated into different labile and non-labile pools. The chemical speciation of phosphorus (P) in crop residues is an important determinant of the fate of this P. In this study, we used chemical fractionation and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, first separately and then together, to evaluate the P speciation of mature oat (Avena sativa) residue. Two water extracts (one employing shaking and the other sonication) and two acid extracts (0.2 N perchloric acid and 10% trichloroacetic acid) of these residues contained similar concentrations of orthophosphate (molybdate-reactive P determined by colorimetry) as NaOH-EDTA extracts of whole plant material subsequently analysed by solution 31P NMR spectroscopy. However, solution 31P NMR analysis of the extracts and residues isolated during the water/acid extractions indicated that this similarity resulted from a fortuitous coincidence as the orthophosphate concentration in the water/acid extracts was increased by the hydrolysis of pyrophosphate and organic P forms while at the same time there was incomplete extraction of orthophosphate. Two methods for isolating and quantifying phospholipid P were also tested, based on solubility in ethanol:ether and ethanol:ether:chloroform. While these methods were selective and appeared to extract only phospholipid P, they did not extract all phospholipid P, as some was detected by NMR in the crop residue after extraction. These results highlight the need for careful interpretation of results from chemical fractionation, as separation can be compromised by incomplete recovery and side reactions.
See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management & Soil & Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Nutrient Management & Soil & Plant Analysis: II
<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract