182-6 Soil Contamination By Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA): Sources, Migration and Exposure Assessment.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soils & Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Environmental Fate of Chemicals of Emerging Concern - I

Tuesday, November 17, 2015: 9:15 AM
Minneapolis Convention Center, M100 E

Feng Xiao, Civil Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, Matt Simcik, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Thomas Halbach, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN and John Gulliver, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Abstract:
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are emerging anthropogenic compounds that have recently become the target of global concern due to their ubiquitous presence in the environment, persistence, and bioaccumulative properties. This study was carried out to investigate the migration of PFOS and PFOA in soils and groundwater in a U.S. metropolitan area. We observed elevated levels in surface soils (median: 12.2 ng PFOS/g dw and 8.0 ng PFOA/g dw), which were much higher than the soil-screening levels for groundwater protection developed in this study. A clear gradient from historical manufacturing/disposal to remote sites was highlighted. The measured levels in subsurface soils show a general increase with depth, suggesting a downward movement toward the groundwater table and a potential risk of aquifer contamination. Furthermore, concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in monitoring wells in the source zone varied insignificantly over 5 years (2009-2013), suggesting limited or no change in either the source or the magnitude of the source. The analysis also shows that natural processes of dispersion and dilution can significantly attenuate the groundwater contamination; the adsorption on aquifer solids, on the other hand, appears to have limited effects on the transport of PFOS and PFOA in the aquifer. The probabilistic exposure assessment indicates that ingestion of contaminated groundwater constitutes a much more important exposure route than ingestion of contaminated soil. Overall, the results suggest that (i) the transport of PFOS and PFOA is retarded in the vadose zone, but not in the aquifer; (ii) the groundwater contamination of PFOS and PFOA often follows their release to surface soils by years, if not decades; and (iii) the aquifer can be a major source of exposure for communities living near point sources.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soils & Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Environmental Fate of Chemicals of Emerging Concern - I