183-20 Nitrous Oxide Emission Reduction in Cropped Fields As a Function of Timing of Liquid Manure Injection and Use of Nitrification Inhibitors.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Agricultural Practices to Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency and Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emission: II

Tuesday, November 17, 2015: 1:55 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, M100 C

Sisi Lin1, Guillermo Hernandez-Ramirez2, Len Kryzanowski3, Trevor Wallace3, Rory Degenhardt4, Robert Grant5, Nils Berger6, Craig Sprout3, Germar Lohstraeter3, Leigh-Anne Powers3 and Huping Hou5, (1)Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Cook Islands
(2)Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
(3)Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada
(4)Dow AgroSciences, Edmonton, AB, Canada
(5)University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
(6)EuroChem Agro GmbH, Mannheim, GERMANY
Abstract:
Nitrous oxide, one of the major greenhouse gases (GHGs), is mostly derived from agriculture. About 58% of GHG emissions from agriculture are N2O, and two‐thirds of those N2O emissions come from cropping systems having soils that repeatedly receive manures or synthetic nitrogen fertilizers. The main objectives of this research are to investigate GHG reduction strategies and provide efficient mitigation management practices. This research compares N2O emissions from two contrasting manure injection times (fall vs. spring), examines the effectiveness of two nitrification inhibitors {nitrapyrin and 3, 4‐dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)} and identifies the key ecological controls on N2O flux in Alberta cropping systems. In the early fall of 2014, field experiments were initiated at two locations (Edmonton and Lacombe) and will continue until winter 2016. The two locations received different manure types; dairy manure was injected at Edmonton, while swine manure was injected at Lacombe. Flux measurements were conducted in fields and in a lab incubation on soils collected following the spring manure injection. Field flux measurements were done during the frost free periods using automated (every four hours) and manual static chambers (weekly or twice per week following major rainfall or manure injection). The incubation flux measurements were done twice a week during the first two weeks of the incubation, and once a week for the following three weeks. Based on the results from fall 2014 measurements, all manure injections resulted in a significant increase in N2O emissions compared to the controls without manure (264 vs. 18 g N2O‐N ha1 for Edmonton, and 348 vs. 2 g N2O‐N ha1 for Lacombe; Ps < 0.005). The overall average reduction due to the use of nitrification inhibitors was about 26%. These experiments will continue during the next two growing seasons to reveal the annual effects of manure injection times and inhibitors.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Agricultural Practices to Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency and Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emission: II