183-18 Can Manipulation of the Constituents of Ruminant Urine Reduce N2O Emissions from Urine Patches?.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Agricultural Practices to Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency and Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emission: II

Tuesday, November 17, 2015: 1:25 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, M100 C

Dominika J Krol, Patrick J Forrestal, Gary J Lanigan and Karl G Richards, Environment, Soils and Land-Use, Teagasc, Wexford, Ireland
Abstract:
Grazing ruminant livestock deposit 75–90% of their nitrogen (N) intake onto pasture as dung and urine, the latter being of major concern for production of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). With the demand for food increasing, global ruminant numbers are expected to rise, resulting in elevated levels of urine-derived N2O. Consequently, strategies to mitigate these emissions are required. Urine contains hippuric acid (HA) and benzoic acid (BA), both of which have previously been linked to mitigating urine-derived N2O emissions in laboratory studies. A significant reduction of up to 65% was achieved when levels of HA or BA in urine were elevated. If applicable in situ, manipulation of ruminant urine composition could prove a successful N2O mitigation strategy. However, the sole in situ experiment conducted to date was deemed inconclusive due to environmental conditions not conducive to N2O loss.

The current in situ study assessed the efficacy of elevated HA and BA concentrations in ruminant urine for mitigating urine-derived N2O under environmental conditions favouring N2O loss through denitrification.

Results show that urine deposition onto pasture resulted in an immediate increase in N2O fluxes with the largest daily N2O fluxes observed on the day of application. Nitrous oxide peak diminished after five weeks. Urine deposition increased cumulative N2O emissions, however elevation of HA and BA concentrations in urine did not reduce N2O fluxes. As a consequence it was concluded that HA and BA concentration manipulation are ineffective for reducing N2O loss from in situ applications of urine.

Although simulation of dietary manipulation to reduce N2O emissions through altering individual urine constituents appeared to have no effect this is an important area and there may be other manipulations such as reducing urine N content or inclusion of synthetic inhibitory products that warrant further investigation.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Agricultural Practices to Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency and Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emission: II