415-16 Wheat Yield Potential and Yield Gaps in South Africa.

Poster Number 513

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Global Agronomy
See more from this Session: Global Agronomy: III

Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Minneapolis Convention Center, Exhibit Hall BC

Ernest Dube1, Annelie Barnard2, Robbie Lindeque3, Willem Kilian2 and Toi J. Tsilo4, (1)Production Systems, ARC Small Grain Institute, Bethlehem, SOUTH AFRICA
(2)Production Systems, ARC Small Grain Institute, Bethlehem 9700, South Africa
(3)Breeding, ARC Small Grain Institute, Bethlehem 9700, South Africa
(4)Germplasm development, ARC-Small Grain Institute, Bethlehem 9700, South Africa
Poster Presentation
  • ASA-CSSA-SSA Conference 2015 Ernest Final.pdf (1.5 MB)
  • Abstract:
    Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in South Africa declined sharply over the past decade because of rising input costs and low global wheat prices, among other challenges. In the present research article, the possibility of improving wheat yields in production systems of South Africa was explored through analysing average farmer yields (Ya), yield potential (Yp,  - or water limited yield potential [Yw] in the case of dryland wheat) and yield gaps (Yp or Yw – Ya). Wheat yield data was obtained from farmer-representative yield trials that were conducted continuously over 15 years from 2000 to 2014 across the major production areas of South Africa, namely the summer rainfall area (SRA), the winter rainfall area (WRA) and the irrigation area (IA). Average yields for dryland wheat in the SRA ranged from 1.62 ± 0.046 to 3.61 ± 0.068 t ha-1 and were significantly higher (p<0.001) for later plantings than early plantings. For the WRA, dryland wheat Ya ranged from 3.48 ± 0.072 to 3.85 ± 0.15 t ha-1, and it was significantly higher (p<0.001) for conventional tillage (3.79 t ha-1) than reduced tillage (3.59 t ha-1). However, Yw was higher for reduced tillage (5.67 t ha-1) than conventional tillage (5.32 t ha-1). Irrigated wheat Ya ranged from 6.64 ± 0.15 to 8.32 ± 0.10 t ha-1 and were highest among precision farmers. The exploitable yield gaps, hence potential to improve farmer yields were as follows: SRA (0.46 – 1.48 t ha-1), WRA (0.38 - 1.04 t ha-1) and IA (0.44 – 1.41 t ha-1). Yield gaps were positively related to the Yp. Dryland and irrigated wheat could be increased by 10 – 48% and 7 – 17% through closing exploitable yield gaps in various production systems, respectively. Refinements in farmer planting date decision and tillage practices are important considerations for closing the wheat yield gaps.

    See more from this Division: ASA Section: Global Agronomy
    See more from this Session: Global Agronomy: III