403-4 Global Sensitivity Analysis of Radiative Transfer Model.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Physics and Hydrology
See more from this Session: Remote Sensing of Soil Water: Soil Moisture Active Passive and Beyond

Wednesday, November 18, 2015: 2:35 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, L100 F

Binayak P. Mohanty, MS 2117, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX and Maheshwari Neelam, Biological and Agricltural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Abstract:
With the recently launched Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission, it is very important to have a complete understanding of the radiative transfer model for better soil moisture retrievals and to direct future research and field campaigns in areas of necessity. Because natural systems show great variability and complexity with respect to soil, land cover, topography, precipitation, there exist large uncertainties and heterogeneities in model input factors. In this paper, we explore the possibility of using global sensitivity analysis (GSA) technique to study the influence of heterogeneity and uncertainties in model inputs on zero order radiative transfer (ZRT) model and to quantify interactions between parameters. GSA technique is based on decomposition of variance and can handle non-linear and non-monotonic functions. We direct our analyses towards growing agricultural fields of corn and soybean in two different regions, Iowa, U.S.A (SMEX02) and Winnipeg, Canada (SMAPVEX12). We noticed that, there exists a spatio-temporal variation in parameter interactions under different soil moisture and vegetation conditions. Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) behaves more non-linearly in SMEX02 and linearly in SMAPVEX12, with average parameter interactions of 14% in SMEX02 and 5%  in SMAPVEX12. Also parameter interactions increased with vegetation water content (VWC) and roughness conditions. Interestingly, soil moisture shows an exponentially decreasing sensitivity function whereas parameters such as root mean square height (RMS height) and vegetation water content show increasing sensitivity with 0.05 v/v increase in soil moisture range. Overall, considering the SMAPVEX12 fields to be water rich environment (due to higher observed SM) and SMEX02 fields to be energy rich environment (due to lower SM and wide ranges of TSURF), our results indicate that first order as well as interactions between the parameters change with water and energy rich environments

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Physics and Hydrology
See more from this Session: Remote Sensing of Soil Water: Soil Moisture Active Passive and Beyond