49-25 Another Step Forward: Validation of N-Star on Rice in Clay Soils in Arkansas.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: M.S. Graduate Student Oral Competition

Monday, November 16, 2015: 3:45 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, L100 B

Jarom Davidson1, Trenton L. Roberts1, Jarrod T Hardke2, Nathan A. Slaton1, Richard J. Norman1, Anthony Fulford3 and Chester Eugene Greub1, (1)Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
(2)Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Cooperative Extension Service, Stuttgart, AR
(3)University of Arkansas, Normal, IL
Abstract:

Accurate N fertilization is vital to obtain high rice yields in Arkansas. The Nitrogen-Soil Test for Rice (N-STaR) was recently developed to estimate the N mineralization potential of a soil and provide site-specific N fertilizer recommendations. The N-STaR was validated on silt loam soils in Arkansas in 2013, but lacks validation on clay soils. Validation is an essential component in ensuring the accuracy of the N-STaR calibration curves. A total of 12 sites across Arkansas were selected on clay soils of varying native-N availability, soil samples were taken at each location, and N-STaR analysis was completed to determine the N rate using the 100 and 95% relative grain yield (RGY) curves. Six treatments were compared in the validation trial; a control (0 kg N ha-1), the N-STaR 95 and 100% RGY N rates applied in a standard two-way split application (2-WS), the N-STaR 95 and 100% RGY N rates applied in a single pre-flood application (SPF), and the Standard N Recommendation (SNR) based on soil texture and previous crop. Season-total N rates using N-STaR resulted in N rate changes from -224 to 0 kg N ha-1 when compared to the SNR. Nine of 12 locations had no statistical yield differences (α= 0.05) between the N treatments. At K-1, K-2, and B-2, there were no yield differences between the N-STaR 100% RGY treatments and the SNR while the N-STaR 95% RGY SPF was significantly different from the SNR with yield differences ranging from -1261 to -1917 kg ha-1. Furthermore, the N-STaR 95% RGY 2-WS at K-1 yielded 1210 kg ha-1 lower than the SNR. Overall, the N-STaR 100% RGY 2-WS and SPF applications and the N-STaR 95% RGY 2-WS application appear to accurately predict the N needs of rice in Arkansas, but the N-STaR 95% RGY SPF rate may require adjustment.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: M.S. Graduate Student Oral Competition