79-3 Can Varying Nitrogen Application Rates and Timing Reduce the Environmental Impact of Corn Under Future Climate?.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Management Practices and Land-Use Impact on Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity

Monday, November 16, 2015: 1:30 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, 102 E

Benjamin D. Duval1, Peter C. Scharf2, Melannie D. Hartman3, Stephen J. Del Grosso4 and Robert P. Anex1, (1)Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
(2)214 Waters, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, US
(3)Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
(4)Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO
Abstract:
The high nitrogen (N) requirements of corn often lead to losses as leached nitrate (NO3-) and nitrous oxide (N2O) gas. Adjusting the timing of nitrogen fertilizer application to corn to meet plant demand has been suggested as a means of improving corn N uptake efficiency and reducing N losses, yet results from the literature are equivocal and alternative fertilizing strategies have not been evaluated under changing climate conditions. We simulated corn yield and N losses in Iowa, for 3 N application rates based on the Mean Return to Nitrogen (MRTN) calculator, and 4 N application strategies (single application at planting, single application at V6 growth stage, and two applications split between planting and V6) with the DAYCENT biogeochemical model, using historic (1991-2014) and projected future weather scenarios (2041-2065). The highest N application rate caused significantly higher N2O and NO3- losses for split fertilizer and N additions at planting, compared to MRTN and low N applications. N2O emissions from 67:33% split applications at high N rates were significantly higher than all other applications. N2O emissions decreased ~29% for all N treatments under future compared to current climate, but single N fertilization at V6 had the lowest emission increase compared to the other strategies. There was no effect of fertilizer timing on NO3- leaching, but NO3- leaching increased ~42% under future climate compared to current climate across N timing treatments. Model-based projections suggest that split N applications have significantly less impact on N losses than does the total amount of N fertilizer applied. Thus, under future climate, total N application rate and shifts in timing of precipitation will likely be the important drivers of N loss from corn systems, with lower N2O emissions at the expense of greater NO3- leaching.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Management Practices and Land-Use Impact on Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity