393-3 Sulfur Uptake By Corn from Fall- or Spring-Applied S-34 Labelled Fertilizer.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: The Science & Management of Secondary & Micronutrients

Wednesday, November 18, 2015: 1:35 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, L100 A

Fien Degryse, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, AUSTRALIA, Rodrigo Coqui da Silva, Soil Science, Prescott Building, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia, AUSTRALIA, Roslyn Baird, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, Australia and Michael McLaughlin, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, Australia
Abstract:
Sulfur (S) deficiency has become more wide-spread, increasing the need for S fertilization. Sulfur in fertilizers is usually present as sulfate or as elemental S (ES). Sulfate is immediately available to the plant, but leaches easily. Elemental S does not leach and has lower transportation cost, but only becomes available to plants after oxidation to sulfate.

We assessed the effect of fertilizer application time on the contribution of ES and sulfate-S (SO4-S) to crop uptake in a field trial in Champaign (Illinois), through the use of S-34 labeled fertilizer. Labelled fertilizer (MAP with 5% ES and 5% SO4-S) was applied at 28 kg S/ha either in the fall of 2013 or spring of 2014 and S uptake by corn was determined. For the treatment with spring-applied fertilizer, a similar percentage (ca. 11%) of plant S was derived from fertilizer ES and SO4-S at maturity, and for both sources, ca. 16% of the added S was recovered in the crop. When the fertilizer was fall-applied, the recovery of fertilizer ES was similar to that in the spring-applied treatment, but only 6% of the fertilizer SO4-S was recovered in the crop. The much lower recovery of fertilizer SO4-S with the fall-applied fertilizer could be attributed to more leaching of sulfate below the root zone. Sampling of soil in a plot amended with high rates of sulfate indicated that about 80% of the applied sulfate had leached below 91 cm (36 in) of depth when fall applied compared to 40% when spring applied. These results demonstrate the benefit of ES as a slow release S fertilizer in high-rainfall environments, especially with fall applications.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: The Science & Management of Secondary & Micronutrients