95-1 Crop Water Production Functions for Grain Sorghum and Winter Wheat.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Climatology & Modeling
See more from this Session: Evapotranspiration Measurement and Modeling: I (includes student oral competition)

Monday, November 16, 2015: 1:05 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, M100 F

Joseph Moberly1, Robert M. Aiken2, Xiaomao Lin3, Loyd R. Stone1, Alan J. Schlegel4, Louis Louis Baumhardt5, Robert C. Schwartz6 and Dan O'Brien7, (1)Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
(2)Agronomy, Kansas State University, Colby, KS
(3)Kansas State University, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
(4)Kansas State University, Tribune, KS
(5)USDA-ARS, Bushland, TX
(6)2300 Experiment Station Rd, USDA-ARS, Bushland, TX
(7)Kansas State University, Colby, KS
Abstract:
Productivity of water-limited cropping systems can be reduced by untimely distribution of water as well as cold and heat stress. The research objective was to develop relationships among weather parameters, water use, and grain productivity to produce production functions forecasting grain yields of grain sorghum and winter wheat in water-limited cropping systems. Algorithms, defined by the Kansas Water Budget (KSWB) model, solve the soil water budget with a daily time step and were implemented in Matlab. The relationship of grain yield to water use, reported in several crop sequence studies conducted in Bushland, TX, Colby, KS and Tribune, KS were compared against KSWB model results using contemporary weather data. Predictive accuracy of the KSWB model was also evaluated in relation to experimental results. Field studies showed that winter wheat had stable grain yields over a wide range of water use, while sorghum had a wider range of yields over a smaller distribution of water use. The relationship of winter wheat yield to crop water use, simulated by KSWB, was comparable to relationships developed for three of four experimental results; one study conducted in Bushland indicated less crop water productivity. In contrast, for grain sorghum, experimental yield response to an increment of water use was less than that calculated by KSWB for three of four cases; at Colby, simulated and experimental yield response to water use were similar. Simulated yield thresholds were consistent with observed yield thresholds for both wheat and sorghum in all but one case, that for wheat in the Bushland study previously mentioned. Factors in addition to water use likely contributed to these differences.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Climatology & Modeling
See more from this Session: Evapotranspiration Measurement and Modeling: I (includes student oral competition)

Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>