Partial least squares (PLS) regression was used to create calibrations for pH and LBC using either the field or laboratory spectra. The prediction capability for pH using the field spectra was much poorer than prediction using the laboratory spectra. However, prediction of LBC using the field spectra produced as good or better results as those using the laboratory spectra. Consequently, it was feasible to apply the PLS model to all spectra collected in the field to characterize the spatial variation of LBC. This resulted in a lime buffer capacity map for each of the five fields which characterizes the spatial variation in LBC.
To further investigate the usage of the prototype spectrophotometer for pH prediction, it was used to scan the dried samples in a laboratory setting. A new PLS calibration was made for pH using these spectra, resulting in a 25% reduction in validation error over usage of the field spectra. However, the validation error was still significantly greater than the error obtained using the laboratory grade spectrophotometer. In summary, the field-mobilized spectrophotometer worked well for the prediction of LBC but was not able to deliver spectra of high enough quality for accurate pH predictions. This was true of the field measurements and to a lesser extent true of the lab measurements of dry soil. On the other hand, the potential for success with this measurement has been demonstrated using the laboratory instrument. Field measurement of pH may eventually be feasible by improving the spectral resolution and/or the signal-to-noise ratio of the field system. Such improvements are currently being made.
Back to 1.5A Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy, Soil Sensing, Remote Sensing and Image Analysis - Theater
Back to WCSS
Back to The 18th World Congress of Soil Science (July 9-15, 2006)