2008 Joint Annual Meeting (5-9 Oct. 2008): Above- and below-Ground Litter Manipulation: Impact on the Retention and Release of Dissolved C and N.
Start | Author Index

607-25 Above- and below-Ground Litter Manipulation: Impact on the Retention and Release of Dissolved C and N.



Monday, 6 October 2008
George R. Brown Convention Center, Exhibit Hall E
Sarah M. Robinson1, Elizabeth Evetts1, Whitney Taylor2, Richard Bowden3, Janos A. Toth4, William H. McDowell2, Kate Lajtha5 and Jacqueline Aitkenhead-Peterson1, (1)Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, 2474 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
(2)Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, James Hall, Durham, NH 03824
(3)Allegheny Col., Allegheny ColDep.of Envir.Sci, North Main Street, Meadville, PA 16335
(4)Botany, University of Debrecan, Egyetem tem1, H-4010 Debrecen, Hungary
(5)Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Cordley Hall 2082, Corvallis, OR 97331
Above and below-ground litter plays an important role in forest ecosystems in terms of nutrient dynamics.  We examined the impact of manipulating above- and below-ground litter on the retention and release of DOC, DON and DIN in the International Long Term Ecological Research (ILTER) site at Sikfokut Forest, Hungary.  Treatments included double annual leaf litter (DL), double wood (DW), removal of annual leaf litter (NL) removal of root inputs (NR) and removal of both leaf litter and roots (NI) plus control plots each replicated three times.  Soil was excavated at 0-5, 5-15, and 15-30 cm in each plot.  We used the mass isotherm method to quantify retention and release.   We hypothesized that with litter removal there would be less retention of C and N on sorption sites compared to those treatments with doubling of litter. Treatment did not impact DOC retention in the 0-5 or 5-15 cm layers (p > 0.05). Release of DOC was significantly different with treatment in the both the 0-5 and 5-15 cm layers (p < 0.01). Ammonium retention and release in the 0-5 cm layer was significantly impacted by treatment (p < 0.001).  Treatment did not impact nitrate retention (p > 0.05) but significantly impacted its release (p < 0.05) in the 0-5 cm layer whereas in the 5-15 cm layer nitrate was not retained at all.  The opposite occurred with DON where it was not retained in the 0-5 cm layer but retained in the 5-15 cm layer.
See more of: Nutrients and Soil Structure: II (includes Graduate Student Competition) (Posters)
See more of: S11 Soils & Environmental Quality