2008 Joint Annual Meeting (5-9 Oct. 2008): Effect of Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizers on Potato Yield and Nitrate Leaching in Northeast Florida.

602-5 Effect of Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizers on Potato Yield and Nitrate Leaching in Northeast Florida.



Monday, 6 October 2008
George R. Brown Convention Center, Exhibit Hall E
Yandi Fan, Soil & Water Science, University of Florida, 2169 McCarty Hall, P.O.Box 110290, Gainesville, FL 32611, Rao S. Mylavarapu, Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, 2169 McCarty Hall, PO Box. 110290, Gainesville, FL 32611 and Chad M. Hutchinson, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, PO Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611
Water availability and water quality in the Tri-county Agricultural Area (TCAA) in the lower St. Johns River basin are two critical concerns in northeast Florida. A three-year study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of an alternate seepage irrigation method and fertilization management on potato yield and water use efficiency. The field trial consisted of two levels of seepage irrigation systems (regular and reduced) in combination with two N sources- Urea and Controlled Release Fertilizer (CRF) at 168 and 224 kg N ha-1. In 2006, a significant difference was observed in marketable yields, 27.6 MT ha-1 and 22.5 MT ha-1, under CRF224 and Urea224, respectively. No significant difference in yields was observed between CRF168 and Urea168. In 2007, marketable yield under CRF168 treatment (34.9 MT ha-1) was significantly higher than Urea168 (29.4 MT ha-1). Treatment CRF224 and CRF168 recorded the highest yields in 2006 and 2007, respectively. In 2006, the lowest mean NO3-N concentration (0.51 mg L-1) in the water table was observed under treatment CRF224. In 2007, treatment Urea224 recorded significantly higher mean NO3-N concentration of 3.32 mg L-1 in the water table than treatment Urea168 (1.85 mg L-1). CRF treatments produced better yields in both years, and reduced nitrate leaching into the water table in 2006, compared to Urea treatments. No evidence, however, was found that CRF treatments helped reduce leaching compared to Urea treatments in 2007.