104-20 The Effect of Elevated CO2 and O3 On Soil Nitrogen Inputs and Losses in a Soybean Agroecosystem in Illinois.

Poster Number 973

See more from this Division: S03 Soil Biology & Biochemistry
See more from this Session: Soil Biology and Biochemistry Student Poster Competition
Monday, November 1, 2010
Long Beach Convention Center, Exhibit Hall BC, Lower Level
Share |

Charlotte Decock1, Haegeun Chung2, Rodney Venterea3 and Johan Six1, (1)Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA
(2)Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
(3)USDA-ARS Soil & Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, MN
It has been found that elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (eCO2) and tropospheric ozone (eO3) affect belowground microbial processes, including N transformations, through plant-mediated changes. Conversely, changes in soil organic carbon sequestration and plant biomass production are constrained by N availability. Furthermore, changes in N losses to the groundwater or the atmosphere cause eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems and global climate change, respectively. Therefore, it is pertinent to assess the effect of eCO2 and eO3 on N inputs and losses. In a soybean agroecosystem in Illinois, we used natural abundance stable isotopes as a proxy to integrate long-term N inputs and losses, based on minimal isotopic discrimination during biological N2-fixation, and 15N depletion associated with lost N. Our isotopic model suggested that N-inputs and losses decreased by eCO2, whereas inputs and losses increased by eO3. Under eCO2, changes in inputs and losses balanced each other out, while a larger increase in inputs compared to losses under eO3 resulted in a larger soil N content under eO3 compared to ambient. Differences in N-losses between treatments are due to removal of soil derived N by harvest, N leaching and gaseous N emissions. Soil derived N removed by harvest was increased by eCO2, and there was a stimulation of the cumulative N2O flux during the growing season in 2005 but not in 2006. Consequently, the reduction in N loss under eCO2 compared to ambient must be a result of decreased N leaching or decreased total gaseous loss. eO3 did not affect the amount of soil N removed by harvest or the cumulative N2O flux during the growing season. Hence, the increased N loss under eO3 compared to ambient might be due to changes in total gaseous N loss, N2O emissions during the non-growing season or increased leaching. In conclusion, our results warn for increased environmental risk for hazardous N loss from agroecosystems under changing atmospheric conditions.
See more from this Division: S03 Soil Biology & Biochemistry
See more from this Session: Soil Biology and Biochemistry Student Poster Competition