118-2 Gross N Cycling in Simple Rotations: Do Pulse Crops Make a Difference?.

See more from this Division: S06 Soil & Water Management & Conservation
See more from this Session: Management Practices Impact On Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems: Storage and Dynamics
Monday, November 1, 2010: 9:15 AM
Hyatt Regency Long Beach, Beacon Ballroom B, Third Floor
Share |

Angela Bedard-Haughn1, Louis-Pierre Comeau1 and Amy Sangster2, (1)University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
(2)AgraPoint, Bible Hill, NS, Canada
Pulse crops in rotation improve the sustainability of cropping systems through biological N fixation, but the benefit of pulses is also proposed to extend beyond the year of pulse production. To quantify any additional benefits, soil processes and properties related to N and C cycling were examined in long-term crop rotations with and without pulse crops at two Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Stations: Scott, SK (pea-wheat, canola-wheat, continuous wheat) and Swift Current, SK (lentil-wheat and continuous wheat). Stable 15N isotope dilution was used to quantify gross mineralization and nitrification rates for three years at Scott and two years at Swift Current. Measurements were completed annually at pre-seeding, anthesis and post-harvest. Results will be presented and related to additional measures of residue quantity and quality. Implications for crop rotations will be discussed.
See more from this Division: S06 Soil & Water Management & Conservation
See more from this Session: Management Practices Impact On Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems: Storage and Dynamics