See more from this Division:
S11 Soils & Environmental Quality
See more from this Session:
Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Agricultural Production Systems
Wednesday, November 3, 2010: 8:50 AM
Long Beach Convention Center, Seaside Ballroom A, Seaside Level
Xiying Hao1, Chunli Li1, Robert Blackshaw1, Kenneth Harker2, John O'Donovan2 and George Clayton1, (1)AAFC Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
(2)Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada
ABSTRACT
Environmentally Smart
Nitrogen (ESN, polymer coated urea) has the potential to reduce N2O
emissions. Our study investigated N2O emissions from canola
production on three different soil types receiving urea or ESN fertilizer.
Canola (Brassica napus L.) was
grown in rotation with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) from 2005 to 2008 on a Grey Luvisol (Haplocryalf) at Beaverlodge, a Black Chernozem (Haplocryoll) at Lacombe and a Dark Brown Chernozem (Haplustoll) at Lethbridge. Urea and ESN
were applied at 1 and 1.5 times (x) the recommended agronomic rate. The N2O emissions were measured using vented static chambers bi-weekly
during the growing season from 2005 to 2008 at Lethbridge and from 2006 to 2008 at Lacombe
and Beaverlodge. N2O emissions from canola fields varied
considerably (0.11 to 4.44 kg N ha-1 yr-1) during the
growing season across all three soil types. When applied at the recommended
agronomic rate, average N2O emissions from ESN treatments across the
whole experimental period were 78% (P=0.08), 110% (P=0.65) and 64% (P=0.04) of
values from urea treatments for Grey Luvisol, Black Chernozem and Dark Brown Chernozem,
respectively. When ESN was applied at 1.5 x the agronomic rate, N2O
emissions were 582% (P=0.04), 93% (P=0.76) and 145% (P=0.31) of values from ESN
applied at its recommended agronomic rate, for the three corresponding soils.
Our study suggests that N2O emission could be reduced using ESN,
compared to urea. However, the reduction potential depends on soil type
(location). Applying ESN at higher than the recommended agronomic rate should be avoided,
particularly to Grey Luvisol where the increases in N2O
emissions were far greater with higher fertilizer application rates.