See more from this Division:
U.S. Canola Association Research Conference
See more from this Session:
Canola Agronomy – Crop Production: Spring
Wednesday, November 3, 2010: 8:20 AM
Long Beach Convention Center, Room 201A, Second Floor
Edwin Lentz, Ohio State University, Tiffin, OH
Historically agronomic crops do not respond on most Ohio soils to
supplemental S. Winter canola is known to have a larger demand for S than other
crops. Since winter canola is a relatively new crop in Ohio little is known about the affects of
supplemental S. To test the hypothesis that canola yields may be increased with
supplemental S, the variety ‘Wichita' was established on the OARDC Northwest
Research Station near Custar in 2003, 2004, and 2006; and at the North Central
Research Stations near Fremont in 2006, 2007, and 2008. Each plot received 22.4
– 33.6 kg ha-1 of fall N prior to planting and 112 kg ha-1 of
spring N prior to bolting. Sulfur was applied the same time as spring N at two
rates (22.4 and 44.8 kg ha-1). Ammonium sulfate was applied in 2003
and 2004 with the balance of urea to achieve 112 kg N ha-1. Sulfur
was applied as pelletized gypsum in 2006 – 2008; urea provided the N. Surface
applied urea was the N source for treatments receiving no S. Leaves were
collected at early pod development to determine S content. Experimental design
was a completely randomized block with four replications. Statistical analysis
was a simple ANOVA. Even though leaf analysis showed increase S content, yields
were not significantly larger for any of the site years compared to plots only
receiving N. Supplemental S should not be expected to increase winter canola
yields for most Ohio
soils.