189-4 Effects of Harvest Method On Sugarcane Trash Nutrients and Yield in Florida and Costa Rica.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Agronomic Production Systems
See more from this Session: Overcoming Production Barriers: I
Tuesday, October 23, 2012: 9:30 AM
Duke Energy Convention Center, Room 232, Level 2
Share |

Hardev Sandhu1, Robert Gilbert1, G. Kingston2, J. F. Subiros3, Kelly Morgan4, R. W. Rice5, Les Baucum6, James Shine7 and Lee Davis8, (1)University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL
(2)BSES Limited, Bundaberg, Australia
(3)Azucarera El Viejo, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
(4)Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Immokalee, FL
(5)Palm Beach County Extension Service, University of Florida, West Palm Beach, FL
(6)Hendry county extension service, University of Florida, La Belle, FL
(7)Sugar Cane Growers Coop. of Florida, Belle Glade, FL
(8)United States Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL
Sugarcane (a complex hybrid of Saccharum spp.) harvesting methods include both green and burnt cane harvest.  Green cane harvest leaves a thick trash layer on the soil surface after harvesting which is absent in burnt cane harvest. A 3-year study was conducted in Florida and Costa Rica on 3 soil types to determine the effects of harvest method on trash nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Mn, Cu, and Fe) and yield. Due to significantly greater amount of trash in green cane than burnt cane harvest, all nutrients were significantly greater in green cane. However sugarcane biomass yield, tons of cane per hectare (TCH) was greater in burnt cane than green cane harvest. It indicates that green cane harvest added significantly greater amount of trash nutrients to the soil, however these nutrients are not available immediately and may increase soil productivity in the long term.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Agronomic Production Systems
See more from this Session: Overcoming Production Barriers: I