358-6 How Many Samples Are Needed to Estimate the Annual N2O Flux From Soils?.

Poster Number 1215

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Greenhouse Gas Emission Methodology and Analyses

Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Debasish Saha, Michigan State University, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, Armen R. Kemanian, Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, Paul R. Adler, Pasture Systems & Watershed Mgmt Research Unit, USDA-ARS Pasture Systems & Watershed Mgmt Research Unit, University Park, PA, Benjamin M Rau, USDA-ARS Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA, Felipe Montes, Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA and Jason P. Kaye, Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Abstract:
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is emitted from agricultural soils mostly in transient peaks. Therefore, fixed time interval sampling (e.g. chamber method) does not ensure an accurate estimation of annual cumulative flux due to the non-linear temporal variability of the flux. We propose that a simulation model can be used to estimate the error of different sampling strategies for estimating annual flux. Our objective was to estimate the error and variability associated with regular (varying time intervals) or rule based (i.e. depending on soil water content and precipitation) sampling. Cycles, a daily time step agroecosystem model, was used to simulate soil N2O flux along with other bio-geochemical processes from three different agroecosystems: Ames; Iowa (corn-soybean), Pullman; Washington (winter wheat), and College Station; Texas (corn)­­­­. Daily N2O emission, soil temperature and water content were obtained from a multi-year time-span. Then, we “sampled” the daily N2O emissions from the model outputs using regular time intervals (2, 4… 32 days) and rule-based method. The rule-based annual flux was estimated as the sum of “measured” emission plus and estimated emission for the non-samples days. For regular sampling to remain within ±25% of the annual flux, samplings every 8 days are needed in Ames and Pullman, and every 4 days are needed at College Station. However, because fluxes in Pullman are smaller than at the other locations, the absolute error is small even at larger sampling intervals. Sampling every 8 days rendered a standard deviation of 0.5, 0.12, and 0.51kg N yr-1 at College Station, Pullman, and Ames, respectively. The rule-based method provided promising results by explaining 50-90% of the modeled annual flux (best in Ames) with a comparatively lower number of samples than weekly sampling. Thus, a simulation model may be used to design a sampling strategy before a costly field campaign.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Greenhouse Gas Emission Methodology and Analyses