232-6
Physiological Characterization and Modeling of Soybean in a Maximum Yield Environment.

Tuesday, November 5, 2013: 9:15 AM
Marriott Tampa Waterside, Room 1, Second Level

Ryan J. Van Roekel, Montserrat Salmeron and Larry C. Purcell, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Mean USA soybean grain yields have increased linearly from 739 kg ha-1 in 1924 to 2661 kg ha-1 in 2012 at a rate of 23 kg ha-1 yr-1. However, soybean yields up to 10,790 kg ha-1 have been previously reported in yield contests. Research was undertaken to characterize soybean grown in a maximum yield environment so that crop growth and yield could be modeled with empirical physiological data. From 2011 to 2013, replicated small-plot research was conducted at the Univ. of Arkansas at Fayetteville with 11 to 15 modern, glyphosate-resistant cultivars with a range of relative maturities (RM) from 4.2 to 5.5. Physiological measurements included radiation use efficiency (RUE, g MJ-1), N accumulation rate (g N m-2 d-1), specific leaf N (g N m-2), dry matter allocation coefficient (DMAC, d-1), grain yield and harvest index (HI). Crop models, Sinclair-Soybean (Sinclair et al., 2003) and DSSAT-CROPGRO (v.4.5.1.023) were used to model crop growth using weather data taken on site. In 2012, the observed mean RUE, N accumulation rate, specific leaf N, DMAC, grain yield and HI were 1.30 g MJ-1, 1.041 g N m-2 d-1, 2.88 g N m-2, 0.0061, 6746 kg ha-1, and 0.47, respectively. Simulations using the Sinclair-Soybean model with default values underpredicted grain yield and HI both by 24%. Modifying the model with observed values of N accumulation rate, specific leaf N, and RUE overpredicted yield by 17% and underpredicted HI by 27%. CROPGRO was able to accurately predict grain yield (NRMSE < 4%) and grain N concentration (NRMSE < 9%) with input of N and water management and minor cultivar coefficients calibration; however, HI and N accumulation rates were underpredicted by 19 and 33%, respectively. These results indicate that both crop models exhibit some shortcomings but are capable of predicting grain yields as great as were observed.
See more from this Division: C02 Crop Physiology and Metabolism
See more from this Session: Graduate Student Oral Competition

Show comments