245-7 Determination of Soil Hydraulic Parameters with Cyclic Irrigation Tests.
See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Physics and Hydrology
See more from this Session: Soil Physics and Hydrology: I
Tuesday, November 17, 2015: 2:40 PM
Minneapolis Convention Center, 101 J
Abstract:
A method for determining soil hydraulic parameters based on periodic point source solutions of the linearized Richards equation is proposed. Closed-form solutions are derived for buried and surface point sources with a sinusoidally varying flux. These solutions describe the dependence of the matric flux potential (MFP) amplitude and phase shift on the distance from the point sources, frequency of source flux alternations and soil hydraulic parameters. The Fourier series representation of square waves was used to extend the point source solutions for sinusoidally varying flux to square-wave cyclic inputs of water with a 50% duty cycle – a preferable operating mode for field experiments. Close to the sources, the amplitudes and shape of MFP waves from a step-input are more pronounced than those from a sinusoidal input, but the difference between them diminishes as distance increases. The proposed method involves recording the pressure head variations with a continuously reading tensiometer installed below a pressure-compensating emitter controlled by an irrigation computer. Among 16 cyclic step-input irrigation tests reported in this study, one series involved pressure-head measurements at a single depth and varied water-pulse durations; the second series involved pressure-head measurements at various depths with a fixed water-pulse duration. The soil hydraulic conductivity at water saturation, Ks, the coefficient a of Gardner’s model, and the coefficient k of the linearized unsteady-flow equation were estimated by matching the periodic solution for cyclic step input to the measured pressure head data with a two-step inversion procedure: an amplitude-shift (AS) estimation procedure followed by the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) optimization algorithm. The AS procedure was effective, and the LM optimization yielded only minor improvements. The main findings are: (i) the periodic solution for step input yields reasonably good predictions of pressure-head variations measured at various depths below an emitter for different periods of water application; and (ii) the proposed point-source method seems to yield consistent and reliable estimates of the three soil hydraulic parameters. The two-step inverse procedure is implemented in the DIDAS program for Drip Irrigation Design and Scheduling (http://app.agri.gov.il/didas).
See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Physics and Hydrology
See more from this Session: Soil Physics and Hydrology: I