155-16 Evaluation of the Solvita Test As an Indicator of Mineralizable Nitrogen in Minnesota Soils.
Poster Number 1405
See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: M.S. Graduate Student Poster Competition
Monday, November 16, 2015
Minneapolis Convention Center, Exhibit Hall BC
Abstract:
In most corn (Zea mays L.) cropping systems, nitrogen (N) is the most limiting nutrient. While extractable soil N is readily and cheaply measured, determining potentially mineralizable soil N (PMN) is expensive and laborious to ascertain. Accurate, low-cost soil test estimation of PMN could improve fertilizer recommendations and increase N fertilizer use efficiency. Traditional laboratory incubation is recognized as the standard method for predicting PMN, but this procedure cannot supply in-season recommendations due to the long incubation time required. A quick test for CO2 flush after soil rewetting has been proposed as an indicator of microbial activity and PMN. The commercial version of this test, Woods End’s Solvita CO2-Burst test, evaluates the CO2 flush in 24 hours after rewetting dry soil and is a relatively simple tool to estimate potential soil N contributions. Some previous studies have shown high correlations between soil respiration rate from this test and the estimated mineralizable N pool from incubation experiments, but this method has not been tested for Minnesota soils and conditions. The recommended standard rewetting method (20 ml water added to 40 g soil) resulted in high variability for duplicate samples, and greatly underestimated respiration in coarse-textured soils. In a trial experiment, alternative rewetting methods were tested and the 50% water filled pore space method significantly decreased variability, with 87.5% of duplicate samples tested differing from one another by less than 10% compare to 51.3% with the standard method. After two years of testing, our results have shown that the Solvita test is better correlated with PMN estimated from a 64-day aerobic incubation than SOM is (r=0.38 vs. 0.29, respectively). This suggests that the test kit may be a better predictor of required fertilizer N than SOM would be, but neither measure is well correlated.
See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: M.S. Graduate Student Poster Competition