299-8 Evaluation of Alum Amendments of Poultry Litter on Reducing in-House Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Concentrations and Emissions.
Poster Number 402
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Emissions from Livestock Production: II (includes student competition)
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Minneapolis Convention Center, Exhibit Hall BC
Abstract:
The real time effect of alum (Al2(SO4)3 ·14H2O) addition to poultry litter on ammonia (NH3) emissions from poultry houses has not been accurately evaluated. Further, its effects on greenhouse gas (GHG; N2O, CH4, and CO2) emissions has not been assessed. We determined the effects of alum additions on: (i) in-house NH3 and GHG concentrations, (ii) NH3 and GHG emissions, and (iii) litter chemical properties. We continuously measured NH3 and GHG concentrations using a photoacoustic multi-gas analyzer, as well as ventilation (air velocity) from two identical tunnel-ventilated broiler houses located in Northwest Arkansas; where one house was assigned as control and the other was chemically amended with alum in between flocks for three flocks of birds. Real time emission rates were determined by coupling gas concentrations with ventilation rates from each house. Results indicate that alum amendments significantly reduced daily average in-house NH3 concentration by 42% (8.9 vs 15.4 uL L-1), whereas the overall NH3 emission rate was reduced by 47% (7.2 vs 13.4 kg day-1 house-1). The three flocks cumulatively averaged 330 kg NH3 house-1 flock-1 for the alum-treated house and 617 kg NH3 house-1 flock-1 for the control. Alum additions did not significantly affect the concentrations and emissions of N2O and CH4, whereas CO2 emissions were significantly higher from the untreated house. Litter nitrogen (N) content was significant greater, while carbon (C) to N ratio was significantly lower with alum additions. While this study illustrates that alum addition to poultry litter is an effective management practice for reducing in-house NH3 concentrations and emissions, its addition also contributes to the additional benefit of reducing CO2 emissions from poultry facilities.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Emissions from Livestock Production: II (includes student competition)
<< Previous Abstract
|
Next Abstract