378-4 Management of Nitrogen in Irrigated Canola for Agronomic Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Reduction.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Fertilizer Management in Minor Acreage Crops Oral

Wednesday, November 9, 2016: 9:15 AM
Phoenix Convention Center North, Room 127 C

Dale Tomasiewicz, Canada-Saskatchewan Irrigation Diversification Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Outlook, SK, CANADA, Richard Farrell, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, Sarah Wilcott, Dept. of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CANADA and Reynald Lemke, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Abstract:
Canola is the most extensively grown crop under irrigation in the Canadian Prairie region.  Yields (and N recommendations) are high and increasing due to improved varieties and management practices.  Advances in fertilizer products and application options under irrigation, and concerns about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, have created a need to re-assess management of N for irrigated canola.

One field trial was conducted each year since 2012 to determine responses of irrigated canola to N rate (0-100-200kg N/ha), and placement/timing (broadcast/incorporated, side-banded, and split [50% top-dressed]), in terms of yield, quality and GHG emissions.

For 2012-2015, no significant yield responses to the treatments occurred in two of the years.  In one year hail reduced yields by about two-thirds.  In the other year soil residual N was high and yield was reduced by fall frost after late re-seeding of the trial.

Seed yields with optimum N in the two N-responsive years exceeded 3000 kg/ha; yields in the 0-N check treatment were reduced by about 50 and 30%.  Agronomic optimum N rates appeared to be somewhat lower than would usually be recommended for high-yield irrigated canola at the low soil nitrate levels that existed.  Yields did not differ significantly among the N placement/timing treatments.

Seasonal cumulative nitrous oxide emissions varied greatly between years (5+ times higher in the two years with wet early-season conditions).  Emissions were always lowest in the 0-N check treatment, and increased with applied N rate in the other treatments.  Effects of timing/placement also varied among years, with the sideband treatment showing higher emissions than the other treatments in two of the years; the split treatment always had among the lowest emissions.  Applying only the agronomic optimum N rate, and delaying application of a portion of it, may minimize GHG emissions based on results to-date.

The presentation will also include 2016 trial results.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Fertilizer Management in Minor Acreage Crops Oral