220-4 Evaluation of Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation Practices for Mid-South Rice Production.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Agronomic Production Systems
See more from this Session: Crop Irrigation Strategies and Management Oral (includes student competition)

Tuesday, November 8, 2016: 10:20 AM
Phoenix Convention Center North, Room 126 B

Richard Lee Atwill II1, Larry Jason Krutz1, Jason Bond2, Bobby R. Golden1 and Timothy W. Walker3, (1)Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS
(2)Delta Research and Experiment Station, Stoneville, MS
(3)Horizon Ag LLC, Memphis, TN
Abstract:
Rice irrigation currently accounts for the greatest amount of irrigation water applied per hectare over corn, soybeans, and cotton in the mid-southern US. The alluvial aquifer serves as the major source of irrigation water for rice production in Mississippi; however, it is declining at a rate of 37,000 hectare meters yr-1. An experiment was conducted at the in Stoneville, MS to evaluate the yield and physiological response of rice to several alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation regimes. Three rice cultivars were evaluated in six different rice irrigation treatments. Irrigation treatments included: a continuous flood, allowing the flood to recede to the soil surface, 10 cm below, 20 cm below, 30 cm below, and 40 cm below the soil surface. Water level in each paddy was monitored and irrigation events were triggered at each respective threshold back to a 10 cm flood, then allowed to subside until threshold was reached. Rice grain yield response of two AWD treatments were equal to rice grown with a continuous flood. A 200 kg grain yield increase was observed when the flood within a paddy was allowed to recede to the soil surface compared to a continuous flood. Grain yield for continuous flood was equal to rice grown with flood receding to 10 cm below soil surface. Reduction of grain yield was observed when the flood receded past 20 cm below the soil surface as compared to a continuous flood. Water use efficiency was greater for 10 cm below soil surface compared to other treatments. Data from this experiment in 2015 suggest that allowing flood to subside to 10 cm below the soil surface does not result in yield loss compared to a continuous flooded system. Water management practices that reduce groundwater withdrawals are a viable option for rice producers in the mid-south.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Agronomic Production Systems
See more from this Session: Crop Irrigation Strategies and Management Oral (includes student competition)