105818 Effects of Crop Rotation and Grazing in an ICLSs on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Northern Great Plains.
Poster Number 1403
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions General Poster I
Abstract:
3 Department of Animal Science, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, BMYO, Çanakkale, Turkey
Integrated
crop-livestock system (ICLS) is an
alternative that alleviates some of the
environmental problems resulted from intensification of
crops and livestock. However, little is known about the effects of ICLS
on soil surface greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Northern Great Plains. The objective was to monitor soil surface
GHG fluxes: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and
nitrous oxide (N2O) to assess the impacts of crop rotation and grazing in an ICLS
on the environment. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 3
replications at Dickinson Research Extension Center ranch located southwest of
Manning, North Dakota. The crop rotation treatment included (i) continuous spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
(control), (ii)
sunflower (Helianthus annuus
L.)-spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-cover
crop-corn (Zea mays L.)-field pea (Pisum sativum L.) & barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), (iii)
spring wheat-cover crop-corn-pea & barley-sunflower, (iv) cover
crop-corn-pea & barley-sunflower-spring wheat, (v) corn-pea &
barley-sunflower-spring wheat-cover crop, and (vi) pea &
barley-sunflower-spring wheat-cover crop-corn. The cover crops from September to June were
winter triticale (Triticosecale Wittm.) and
hairy vetch for hay. A 7-specie cover crop in fall and winter was for cow
winter grazing. The preliminary results in 2016 indicated that annual average
soil surface N2O fluxes ranged from 2.74 to 4.75 g ha-1 d-1
and highest fluxes were found in control. The rotation did not significantly
impact the N2O fluxes, but grazing significantly impacted N2O
emission. The emission was significantly higher in grazed plots (5.73 g ha-1
d-1) than that in ungrazed plots (2.98 g
ha-1 d-1). The rotation and grazing treatments did not
impact CO2 and CH4 fluxes. The soil CO2 fluxes
had a downward trend over time[DL1] with decreases of temperatures.
[DL1]Difficult to understand this statement. Can you explain "time" and the relationship to GHG fluxes, especially considering the previous statements.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions General Poster I