Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

106331 Comparison of Grape Vineyard Linear-Soil Heat Flux and Soil Heat Pulse Probe Arrays.

Poster Number 1002

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Physics and Hydrology
See more from this Session: Soil Physics and Hydrology General Poster Session 1

Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Chihiro Naruke, Utah State University, Logan, UT, Scott B. Jones, Department of Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT, Sebastian Los, Department of Plants, Soils, and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT, Larry Hipps, Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT, Lynn McKee, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab., USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, Joseph G Alfieri, Bldg 007, Rm 104, BARC-W, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, Nurit Agam, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer campus, ISRAEL, John H. Prueger, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA and William Kustas, USDA-ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD
Abstract:
Soil heat flux determination is important for reconciling the surface energy balance. Soil heat flux varies with sensing location and is greatly affected by vegetation orientation relative to solar position. Non-homogeneous vegetation such as vineyards and orchards are particularly challenging due to non-uniform shading effects. As part of the GRAPEX (Grape Remote sensing Atmospheric Profile and Evapotranspiration eXperiment) research project conducted in two Pinot Noir vineyards near Lodi CA, five soil heat flux plates (SHFP) were installed in a linear array between two grape vine rows spaced 3.35 m apart. This 5-SHFP system array was compared with a linear array of five soil heat pulse probes (SHPP), located adjacent to and at the same depth as the heat flux plate sensors. Each SHFP system was comprised of a Hydra Probe soil moisture sensor at a 5 cm depth, thermocouples at 2 and 6 cm depths and a soil heat flux plate at 8 cm. These paired arrays were located approximately 30 m west of an eddy covariance/flux tower system within each vineyard having different biomass/leaf area. We compared the minimum, maximum, average and range of soil heat flux based on each sensor array for better understanding the uncertainty in estimating soil heat flux from these two soil heat flux measurement systems. Implications on the effect of soil heat flux estimation on energy balance closure of the eddy covariance systems will be discussed.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Physics and Hydrology
See more from this Session: Soil Physics and Hydrology General Poster Session 1