Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

107046 Impact of Soil-pH on Soil Test Phosphorus Extraction Results.

Poster Number 930

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis General Poster

Monday, October 23, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Edmond Bryan Rutter1, D. Brian Arnall2, Chad J. Penn3, Jason G. Warren1 and Hailin Zhang4, (1)Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
(2)Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
(3)ARS, USDA, West Lafayette, IN
(4)368 Agriculture Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Abstract:
Information regarding the bioavailability of soil phosphorus (P) is generally gained through the use of chemical soil extractions, where extractable P is frequently interpreted as bio- or plant-available P. The availability of P is believed to be strongly influenced by soil-pH, however, research into the relationship between P extractability and soil-pH is lacking. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of soil-pH on the results of several well-established soil-P extraction methods. These effects were investigated in soils from four sites in Oklahoma; a Dale silt loam, Grant silt loam, Teller fine sandy loam, and Easpur loam from Chickasha, Lahoma, Perkins, and Stillwater, OK, respectively. Soil-pH was manipulated during previous trials through the use of alum and hydrated lime applied at rates necessary to achieve a range of target soil-pH. Extractable-P was determined using various extraction methods, including Bray-P1 (BP1), Mehlich-3 (M3P), water soluble (WSP), and total-P (TP; by acid digestion). The correlation between TP and soil-pH was not statistically significant at any site (p=0.7812). BP1, M3P, and WSP exhibit curvilinear relationships with soil-pH. The correlation between M3P and BP1 was statistically significant (r=0.91, p=2.2e^-16). The correlation between M3P and WSP was not significant at Lahoma or Stillwater, but was significant at Chickasha (r=-0.3629, p=0.0043) and Perkins (r=0.4981, p=0.0023). The strong correlation between BP1 and M3P is expected, and suggests that one may be used to reliably predict the other. The relationship between WSP and soil-pH is well-explained by current theory regarding P solubility and soil-pH; where maximum P extractability (solubility) occurred in soils between pH 6 and 6.5, and decreased in both lower and higher pH soils due to interactions with aluminum and iron, or calcium, respectively. The relationships between M3P and BP1 and soil-pH were unexpected; where extractability generally increased with a decrease in soil-pH. Based on these results, M3P is likely an acceptable predictor of BP1, and vice-versa, but may not be a good predictor of WSP.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis General Poster