Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

198-7 Effects of Gradual Filling on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Liquid Dairy Manure.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions General Oral I (Student's Oral Competition)

Tuesday, October 24, 2017: 10:50 AM
Tampa Convention Center, Room 33

Vera Sokolov1, Andrew VanderZaag2, Jemaneh Habtewold3, Kari Dunfield4, Claudia Wagner-Riddle3 and Rob Gordon5, (1)Nepean, Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario, ON, CANADA
(2)Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
(3)School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CANADA
(4)University of Guelph, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
(5)Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Abstract:
Storage of animal manure is a large contributor to greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector. Most emission research has been conducted on lab-scale manure storages These are usually batch filled without inoculant, whereas farm-scale dairy manure storages are loaded gradually, at daily or weekly intervals. We measured methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from 6 meso-scale storage tanks (6.6 m2 each) from June to October 2016 (139 d). Tanks were enclosed by steady-state chambers and concentrations were continuously measured using tunable diode lasers. Half of the tanks were batch filled on day 1 (Jun-1) while the remaining were gradually filled over three stages (day 1, 20 and 40). Each tank within the batch and continuously filled groups had a different inoculant level (0%, 10%, and 20%). Tanks containing inoculum had more CH4 emissions in gradual filled tanks (~7.4 Kg m-3), compared to batch filled tanks (~5.6 Kg m-3). The 10% inoculant had 31% more CH4 emissions in gradual filled tanks, while the 20% inoculant tanks had 21% more CH4 emissions. This is due to higher average temperature in gradual filled tanks (16.8 °C vs 18.9 °C). In 0% inoculant tanks, CH4 emissions had opposite treatment effects. Gradual tank had 27% less CH4 emissions (5.8 vs 4.2 Kg m-3). This is due to a combination of high solids (20% dry matter) and lower average temperature (17.4 °C). N2O emissions showed no treatment difference between continuous and batch filled tanks (0.95 Kg m-3 vs 0.90 Kg m-3, respectively). When compared on a total CO2-equivalent basis of CH4, N2O, and NH3, the batch fill tanks had 13% less emissions. Overall, the results suggest that batch filled studies may underestimate the CH4 emissions expected from real dairy farms.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions General Oral I (Student's Oral Competition)