Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

107695 Effect of Inoculant on VFA Degradation and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Liquid Dairy Manure.

Poster Number 1501

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions General Poster II (Students' Poster Competition)

Monday, October 23, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Vera Sokolov1, Andrew VanderZaag2, Jemaneh Habtewold3, Kari Dunfield4, Claudia Wagner-Riddle3 and Rob Gordon5, (1)Nepean, Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario, ON, CANADA
(2)Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
(3)School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CANADA
(4)University of Guelph, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
(5)Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Abstract:
The storage of livestock manure is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the agricultural sector. Most GHG emissions research has been conducted on lab-scale manure storages, which are batch filled without inoculant. We measured continuous emissions of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) as well as ammonia (NH3) using tunable diode lasers from 6 replicated meso-scale storage tanks (6.6 m2 each) from June to October 2016 (139 days). Tanks were enclosed by steady-state chambers to capture emissions. Half of the tanks were batch filled on day 1 (Jun-1) while the remaining were gradually filled over three stages (day 1, 20 and 40). Each tank within the batch and gradually filled groups had different inoculant levels (0%, 10%, and 20%). Volatile fatty acids (VFA) were samples twice during storage, and analysed using a gas chromatograph. From Aug-5 to Sept-24, there was an 88% drop in the total VFAs in all tanks. The 0% inoculant tanks contained 65% of the total VFAs on Aug-5 and 93% on Sept-24. This suggests slowed degradation when inoculant was absent. This is reflected in the CH4 emissions, where the 0% inoculant tanks had on average 25% fewer total CH4 emissions (5.0 vs 6.5 Kg m-3 or 8.3 vs 1.1 Kg m-2). Our results showed little difference between 10% and 20% inoculant tanks (6.6 and 6.5 Kg m-3 or 10.8 and 10.7 Kg m-2, respectively). Additionally, on Aug-5, the tanks with 0% inoculant showed high concentrations of propionic acid (~3.0 g L-1) which is thought to disrupt methanogenesis, while inoculant containing tanks all had concentrations below detectable levels. When compared on a total CO2-equivalent basis of CH4, N2O, and NH3, the 0% inoculant tanks still had 24% fewer emissions compared to inoculated tanks, suggesting that slowed degradation effected all GHG production.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions General Poster II (Students' Poster Competition)