Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

108488 Source and Presence of Urea in Maryland’s Estuarine Waters.

Poster Number 1323

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soils and Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soils and Environmental Quality General Poster

Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Eric B. May1, Sabrina M Klick2, Mason D. King3, Arthur L. Allen4, Fawzy M. Hashem5, Joseph S Pitula6, Anthony R. Buda7, Lou S Saporito7 and Ray B. Bryant8, (1)Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD
(2)Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore-State of MD, Princess Anne, MD
(3)University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD
(4)Crop and Aquaculture Bldg, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD
(5)30921 Martin Court, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD
(6)University of Maryland Eastern Shore-State of MD, Princess Anne, MD
(7)Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, University Park, PA
(8)Curtin Road, USDA-ARS, University Park, PA
Abstract:
Since the presence of the neurotoxin domoic acid in the coastal waters of California resulted in significant mortalities among marine life concern has risen regarding urea which is used by the filamentous diatom Pseudo-nitzschia sp. as an energy source but results in the production of domoic acid. The diatoms containing domoic acid are filtered by shellfish which in turn become contaminated with the toxin. With increased use of urea and poultry litter as fertilizers in watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay researchers have seen increasing levels of urea in the estuarine zones of the Bay, in many cases above the 600 ppb threshold considered to be the level at which Pseudo-nitzschia sp. can begin produce domoic acid. While there is no immediate threat, there is the need to investigate the source and potential for urea to be an issue in the future. This talk will present findings from studies on the Manokin River, farm ditches and mesocosms aimed at examining what conditions favor the presence of urea in surface waters, and if those conditions would allow urea to enter estuarine zones at levels considered to be significant. From the Manokin River we found in late summer significant levels of urea which at times exceeded the 600 ppb threshold, all occurred following rain events. In ditches we again found urea at levels above 600 ppb, again following rain events but after the water had become stagnant. The ditches were recreated in mesocosms which also produced urea, but in this case not at levels seen in the ditches or open water. We feel that there is the potential for urea to become a more significant problem in the future.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soils and Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Soils and Environmental Quality General Poster