104349
Irrigation Management and Crop Modeling in Safflower.

See more from this Division: Submissions
See more from this Session: Professional Oral - Crops

Tuesday, February 7, 2017: 2:15 PM

Sukhbir Singh, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, Sangamesh V. Angadi, 2346 State Rd 288, New Mexico State University, Clovis, NM, Kulbhushan K. Grover, P.O. BOX 30003, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM and Kenneth J. Boote, Agronomy Dept., 3105 McCarty Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Abstract:
The fast declining Ogallala Aquifer is a major challenge for the researchers to sustain crop productivity in the Southern High Plains. In addition, erratic droughts, heat waves, and low crop prizes are increasing the constraints for crop production in the region. Inclusion of low input, drought tolerant crops such as safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is one of the strategies to extend the life of the Aquifer. A multi-year field study was conducted with the aim to assess the effects of preseason irrigation, in-season irrigation levels, and growth stage based deficit irrigation on stress physiology, yield formation, and water extraction patterns of spring safflower. A process based crop model, the CROPGRO, was also adapted for safflower to simulate its growth, seed yield, evapotranspiration (ET), and water use efficiency (WUE). In response to water stress, safflower used morphological modifications and stomatal regulation to maintain physiological activities. Reduction in leaf area index, light interception, photosynthesis, and plant biomass ultimately reduced seed yield under water stress. More water availability through preseason irrigation improved the seed yield of safflower compared to no-preseason irrigation, whereas no yield benefits were observed after a certain level of in-season irrigation level. Water extraction patterns indicated that safflower relied on soil moisture extraction when irrigation was not sufficient to meet its water requirement. Limiting irrigation after flowering was least detrimental to safflower yield and it was attributed to more efficient water use during this period. Overall, the CROPGRO-safflower model reasonably simulated crop phenology, growth, yield, ET, and WUE of safflower, however, further testing of the model under different environments is needed.

See more from this Division: Submissions
See more from this Session: Professional Oral - Crops

Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>