104439
Comparative Study of Soil Surface Greenhouse Gas Fluxes from Energy Cane and Napier Grass Fields in Relation to Soil Temperature, Soil Moisture and Nitrogen Amendments.

See more from this Division: Submissions
See more from this Session: Graduate Student Oral Competiton – M.S. Students

Monday, February 6, 2017: 10:30 AM

Badri Khanal1, Hari Pratap Singh2, Anuj Chiluwal3, Eric Obeng4, Chris M Clegg5, Robert Richard Lowrance6 and Bharat P Singh1, (1)College of Agriculture, Family Sciences and Technology, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA
(2)Agricultural Research Station, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA
(3)Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
(4)2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
(5)Southeast Watershed Research, USDA-ARS-Tifton, Tifton, GA
(6)Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division (GWERD), National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Ada, OK
Abstract:
Perennial grasses like energy cane (Saccharum spp) and napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schum.) are lignocellulosic bioenergy crops and are considered potential alternatives for sustainable bioethanol production. While it is important to establish a high biomass production system with low inputs it is important to study greenhouse gas fluxes to assess the environmental impacts of one over other. There are limited studies on the emission of greenhouse gases like nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4) from these crops. Current study was conducted at Fort Valley State University Research Farm, Fort Valley, GA from 2011 to 2014 with weekly record of soil temperature (ST), soil moisture (SM) and fluxes from energy cane and napier grass fields. The nitrogen (N) was amended with leguminous cover crop clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) and inorganic N fertilizers (0, 100 and 200 kg N ha-1). The data showed that there was no significant difference among two crops for individual fluxes of CO2, N2O and CH4 (p≤ 0.05). Energy cane N2O flux rate was significantly affected by ST, SM, as well as N amendments. The CO2 flux showed significant relationship with ST and SM, whereas the CH4 flux was significant only in response to ST. The N2O flux from napier grass field was found to have significant response only with N amendments. The CO2 flux showed significant response to ST and SM while CH4 flux showed significant response only with ST. The result of analysis satisfied the hypothesis that fluxes from two crops did not vary, however could not satisfy the hypothesis that all the factors (ST, SM and N) were equally responsible for CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes.

See more from this Division: Submissions
See more from this Session: Graduate Student Oral Competiton – M.S. Students