99961 Phosphorus Fertilizer Source and Rate Effect on Irrigated Alfalfa in Arizona.

Poster Number 449-725

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Impacts of 4Rs (Source, Rate, Time and Place) on Crop Performance Poster

Wednesday, November 9, 2016
Phoenix Convention Center North, Exhibit Hall CDE

Worku Burayu, Maricopa Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, Michael J. Ottman, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ and Ayman Mostafa, Maricopa County Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Poster Presentation
  • Phosphorus Fertilizer Sources and Rates Effect on Irrigated Alfalfa in Arizona.pdf (712.4 kB)
  • Abstract:
    Abstract

     

    Many sources of phosphorus fertilizer are used for high-yield and high-quality alfalfa production in Arizona. Questions are often asked about the effectiveness and plant availability of various P fertilizer sources. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of sources of P fertilizer: monoammonium phosphate, MAP (11-52-0), phosphoric acid, PA (0-52-0) and superphos, SP (0-50-0) at equivalent application rates (0.71, 1.42, 2.13 g P2O5 m-2) plus two higher rates for MAP (5.60 and 11.2 g P2O5 m-2) with untreated check (0.0 g P2O5 m-2) on alfalfa yield, soil test and plant P levels. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications at the University of Arizona, Maricopa Agricultural Center (MAC) in March 2015. Hay yield data was obtained for five consecutive cuttings. Soil and plant tissue samples were collected two times during the research period. Our findings revealed that alfalfa yields were similar when fertilized with MAP, PA or SP at equivalent application rates. When averaged over the three application rates, we found relatively higher cumulative yield of 2463 g m-2 for SP as compared to 2387 g m-2 for PA and 2310 g m-2 for MAP. Generally, yield increased with increased rate within the same source of P fertilizer but only the highest rate of MAP gave significantly higher cumulative yield (2765 g m-2) than the untreated check (2214 g m-2). P fertilizer source and application rate had little effect on soil P and plant P. This research demonstrates that the three sources of P fertilizer were equally effective at equivalent rate of application on irrigated alfalfa in low desert Arizona. Considerations other than agronomic performance such as cost per unit of nutrient, ease of application and availability must be taken into account in selection of specific P fertilizer.

    See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
    See more from this Session: Impacts of 4Rs (Source, Rate, Time and Place) on Crop Performance Poster