Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

99-7 Swine Manure Odor Removal Using Biochar.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Biochar Production and Technology: Global Advancement, Risks and Success

Monday, October 23, 2017: 3:20 PM
Tampa Convention Center, Ballroom A

Okhwa Hwang1, Sungback Cho1, Deug Woo Han1, Sang Ryong Lee1, Heechul Choi1, Jeong Hoon Kwak1, Kyoung S Ro2, Mindy Spiehs3, Bryan L. Woodbury4 and Philip J Silva5, (1)National Institute of Animal Science, Korean Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea, Republic of (South)
(2)ARS, USDA, Florence, SC
(3)USDA, ARS, Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE
(4)USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE
(5)USDA-ARS, Bowling Green, KY
Abstract:
Malodorous emissions from livestock operations disrupt quality of life in rural and urban communities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of various biochars to be used as a sorbent for removing odorants from swine manure storages. Pine, oak, solid-separated swine manure, swine compost, coconut shell, and poultry litter were selected as biomass feedstocks for producing biochar. Pellets of each of these biomass feedstocks were pyrolyzed at 350 oC and 500 oC using a Lindburg electric box furnace equipped with a gas tight retort. Some of these were also partially activated with steam at 700 oC. Biochar samples from swine manure compost and imported coconut shell char were also steam activated using a commercial rotary kiln system in Korea. All biochar samples were analyzed for their elemental compositions, volatile matter, fixed carbon, ash contents, size, density, and surface area. Odorous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were pre-concentrated using pre-conditioned stainless steel sorbent tubes filled with Tenax TA® sorbent. Sorbent tube samples were then analyzed using a thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry system. Manure samples from finishing swine farms with flushed (North Carolina) and deep-pit (Kentuky) manure management systems were collected from commercial swine farms. For each sorption experiments, about 2.5 L of these manure samples were placed in a 19L sealed plastic container. Ultra-pure N2 continuously flushed the headspace of the sealed container at flow rate of about 1.1 L/min. The flushed headspace gas of the sealed container entered a sorption column filled with specific biochar samples. Sorption capacities of each odorants were calculated from influent and effluent odorant concentrations, biochar mass and the N2 flowrate. The results of these laboratory experiments such as biochar properties, odor characteristics, and sorption capacities of different biochar for different odorants will be presented at the symposium.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Biochar Production and Technology: Global Advancement, Risks and Success

<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract