Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

105632 Productivity and Nutritive Quality of Three Brassica Varieties for Use in Pasture-Based Systems.

Poster Number 503

See more from this Division: C06 Forage and Grazinglands
See more from this Session: Forages in Northern Areas Poster

Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Sandra Leanne Dillard, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management, Auburn University, Auburn University, AL and Kathy Soder, USDA-ARS Pasture Systems & Watershed Mgmt Research Unit, University Park, PA
Poster Presentation
  • Dillard et al 2017 ASA Meeting Tampa, FL.pdf (655.9 kB)
  • Abstract:
    Brassicas are gaining popularity among pasture-based livestock producers to extend fall grazing and during the ‘summer slump.’ A 2-yr study was conducted to compare biomass production and nutrient composition of ‘Barisca’ rapeseed (RAP; Brassica napus L.), ‘Inspiration’ canola (CAN; B. napus L.), ‘Appin’ turnip (TUR; B. rapa L.), and ‘KB Supreme’ annual ryegrass (ARG; Lolium multiflorum Lam.). The study was conducted as a completely randomized block (n = 4) at the Pennsylvania State University Russell Larson Agricultural Research Farm in Rock Springs, PA. Plots were planted into a prepared seedbed in August 2015 and 2016 and fertilized at the time of planting with 71 kg N ha-1. Potash, P, and lime were added according to soil test results. Forage was sampled biweekly during October and November using a 0.1-m2 quadrat and were dried, ground, and submitted to DairyOne Laboratories (Ithaca, NY) for wet chemistry analysis of nutritional composition. There was a significant (P = 0.05) forage × year interaction for seasonal biomass production. In 2015, RAP, CAN, and TUR had greater (P < 0.01) seasonal biomass than ARG (1,600 and 471 kg ha-1, respectively). Conversely in 2016, there was no significant (P > 0.14) effect of treatment on seasonal biomass accumulation (730 kg ha-1). Annual ryegrass had the greatest (P < 0.01) CP concentration (293 g kg-1) of all treatments and RAP was greater (P = 0.03) than TUR (270 and 253 g kg-1, respectively). The NDF or ADF concentrations were similar (P > 0.06) among brassica treatments (161 and 136 g kg-1, respectively) but were greater (P < 0.01) in ARG (346 and 173 g kg-1, respectively). While brassicas showed superior biomass in 2015, the hotter and drier fall of 2016 had a significant impact on biomass production in 2016 without impacting nutritive value.

    See more from this Division: C06 Forage and Grazinglands
    See more from this Session: Forages in Northern Areas Poster