Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

106224 Setting Targets for the Phosphorus Index Using Whole-Farm Phosphorus Balances.

Poster Number 1330

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Nutrient Dynamics and Management in Dairy and Beef Cattle Production Systems Poster (includes student competition)

Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Mart B.H. Ros1, Stephen J. Crittenden1, Sebastian Cela1, Karl J. Czymmek1 and Quirine M. Ketterings2, (1)Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
(2)Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Poster Presentation
  • PI-NMB Poster for Annual Meetings Tampa_final.pdf (419.4 kB)
  • Abstract:
    The revised New York phosphorus index (NY-PI) is a framework and tool that ranks relative risk of soil phosphorus (P) loss from agricultural fields, and incentivizes implementation of best management practices (BMPs) known to reduce P runoff risk from individual fields. In the newly proposed NY-PI, landscape factors are combined to obtain a transport score for relative risk of P loss from agricultural fields. Best management practices, like the use of cover crops, setbacks, or manure incorporation or injection, are then used to lower the NY-PI score (credit system) and allow for greater manure management flexibility, depending on the soil P status. This transport × BMP approach is designed to incentivize BMPs where runoff risk is high. However, for enhanced P management over time, the landscape and BMP scores should take into account P nutrient use efficiency across the entire farm, which can be estimated using whole-farm nutrient mass balances (NMBs). The two management tools (NMB and PI) provide unique and complementary information to determine relative risk of P loss, yet have thus far never been combined. Linking the NY-PI and NMBs will allow for a more consistent and scientific P management that will improve whole farm P management, soil P conservation, and water quality. Integration of these two tools is essential for setting of scores and targets for the PI. Here we present a concept that combines the two management tools, as well as findings of PI comparisons for a select number of case study farms with NMB records.

    See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
    See more from this Session: Nutrient Dynamics and Management in Dairy and Beef Cattle Production Systems Poster (includes student competition)