Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

106273 Impacts of Crop Management Systems on Arid Land Soil Quality.

Poster Number 1512

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Land Management and Conservation
See more from this Session: Soil Health for Agroecosystems Poster (includes student competition)

Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Mohammed Nasir Omer, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, Omololu J. Idowu, MSC 3AE, PO Box 30003, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, April L. Ulery, Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, Dawn VanLeeuwen, Applied Statistics & International Business, NMSU, Las Cruces, NM, Steven J. Guldan, New Mexico State University, Alcalde, NM, Nicole Pietrasiak, Plant and Environmental Sciences Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM and Mark A. Marsalis, New Mexico State University, Los Lunas, NM
Poster Presentation
  • Mohammed. Impacts of soil and crop management systems on arid land soil quality. ASA,CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings. October 22-25,2017.pdf (537.5 kB)
  • Abstract:
    A study was conducted to investigate the differences in selected soil quality indicators under different long term (≥ 5 years) soil/crop management systems. Four management systems were selected within the same mapping unit having a surface soil texture of clay loam and two other management systems were selected within another mapping unit having a sandy loam surface soil. Management systems within the clay loam soil were conventionally tilled land with varied annual crops (CVT), alfalfa field (ALF), a peach orchard with clover understory (POC) and a permanent grass field with tall fescue (TFG). The two systems chosen in the sandy ground were conventionally tilled soil with varied annual crops (CTS) and young cottonwood tree orchard (CWP). Soil samples were collected in three replicated fields for each of the management systems at depths of 0-0.05 and 5-0.15 m for soil biological measurements and 0-0.15 and 0.15-0.30 m for soil physical and chemical measurements. Results showed that soil/crop management had the major impacts on soil properties compared to measurement depth and the interaction between soil/crop management and depth was not significant expect for soil organic matter (SOM), available water content (AWC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) and aggregates < 0.25 mm (AGG < 0.25mm). TFG management had significantly higher levels of microbial biomass (4794 ng/g), SOM (2.9%), AWC (0.43%) and water stable aggregates (76%) in the surface soil compared to other management practices irrespective of the soil type. However, the CTS management system had generally less favorable biological and physical soil measurements. This study demonstrates that different soil/crop management systems can significantly impact the quality of arid soils.

    See more from this Division: ASA Section: Land Management and Conservation
    See more from this Session: Soil Health for Agroecosystems Poster (includes student competition)