Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

332-7 Understanding How Much Nitrogen Used By Pasture Comes from Soil or Applied Fertiliser to Improve the Long-Term Sustainability of Australian Dryland Dairy Pasture Systems.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Nitrogen Efficiency, Cycling and Environmental Impacts

Wednesday, October 25, 2017: 9:30 AM
Tampa Convention Center, Room 10

Helen Suter1, Shu Kee Lam2, Charles Walker3 and Deli Chen2, (1)500 Yarra Boulevard, University of Melbourne, Richmond, VIC, AUSTRALIA
(2)School of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
(3)Incitec Pivot Fertilizers, North Shore, Australia
Abstract:
The efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen (N) applied into pasture systems is often based on short term biomass response to fertiliser (e.g. every 28 days). However, pastures will utilise both soil N and fertiliser N, and applied N could be immobilised and re-mineralised in the soil for subsequent uptake. Understanding how much soil N is available will inform better N management. A 15N-urea microplot experiment was conducted as part of a field trial on a rainfed dairy pasture on a Tenosol in south-eastern South Australia from May to October 2014 (growing season) to determine i) how much soil and fertiliser N was utilised by the pasture, and 2) how long the applied N could provide a productivity benefit to the pasture. 15N-urea was applied once (May) at 3 rates (50, 67 and 84 kg N/ha) per with unlabelled urea applied in 4 subsequent fertilisation events. More than 50% of the N taken up by the pasture by the first harvest was derived from soil, with fertiliser derived nitrogen being 38, 41 and 46% for the 50, 67 and 84 kg N/ha application rates respectively. Over the growing season a total of 28-33% of the 15N was recovered in the pasture, with greater recovery at the lower N rate and first 2 harvests. At the end of the growing season 13-15% of the 15N remained in the soil (11-13%) and roots (2%) with the majority recovered in the top 5 cm of soil (8-10%). More than 52-59% of the applied N was lost, presumably from ammonia volatilisation and denitrification. The results show that N remains available in the soil over time, and it is possible that this could be better utilised by manipulating N inputs.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis
See more from this Session: Nitrogen Efficiency, Cycling and Environmental Impacts