Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

107769 Pore Water Nitrate and Phosphate in Coastal Plains Soils with Corn Production: Impact of Irrigation Scheduling.

Poster Number 1028

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil and Water Management and Conservation
See more from this Session: Soil and Water Management and Conservation General Poster

Monday, October 23, 2017
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Gilbert C Sigua1, Kenneth C. Stone1, Philip J. Bauer1, Ariel A. Szogi2, William Myers1 and Paul D. Shumaker1, (1)USDA-ARS, Florence, SC
(2)2611 W Lucas St, USDA-ARS, Florence, SC
Poster Presentation
  • Sigua Poster_2017 ASA Meeting_Water_Tampa.pdf (5.9 MB)
  • Abstract:
    Site-specific irrigation management system has the potential to reduce leaching of nitrogen and phosphorus from the crop root zone, but this has not yet been fully demonstrated in the field. There is a need to find scheduling method to precision-apply water for maximum agronomic and environmental utility. Proper irrigation and nutrient management can reduce nutrient leaching while maintaining crop yield, which is critical in enhancing the sustainability of agricultural crops on soils with low water and nutrient holding capacities. A three-year (2012-2014) field study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effects of three irrigation scheduling methods (ISM): Irrigator Pro (IPRO); Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI) and Soil Water Potentials (SWP) and two levels of N applications (NM): 157 and 224 kilogram N per hectare (kg N/ha) on pore water nitrate (NO3) and phosphate (PO4) in four soil types (ST) with corn production in Coastal Plains, USA. Soil pore water NO3 varied significantly with ISM and NM, but not with ST. The IPRO method had the lowest soil water pore NO3 (11.1 milligram per liter, mg/L) followed by SWP (16.5 mg/L) and NDVI (17.9 mg/L). The low N application rate resulted in lower NO3 concentration (13.4 mg/L) than the high N rate (17.0 mg/ L). Concentrations of soil water pore NO3 and PO4 varied significantly (p≤0.01) with soil depths. Soil water pore PO4 was not affected by ISM, NM and ST. The use of IPRO reduced the concentration of pore water nitrate by about 39% and 33% when compared with NDVI and SWP, respectively. Irrigator PRO may have some advantages in terms of minimizing the concentration of pore water NO3 and PO4 being leached during irrigation when compared with NDVI and SWP. Since the IPRO method resulted in lower soil water pore NO3 and PO4 concentrations, results indicate scheduling method may be a way to reduce nutrient losses to leaching on these soils.

    See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil and Water Management and Conservation
    See more from this Session: Soil and Water Management and Conservation General Poster