Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

65-7 Costs and Potential of Raising the Groundwater Table As a Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Option for Grasslands in Peatland Areas.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Integrated-Crop Livestock System Oral

Monday, October 23, 2017: 11:45 AM
Tampa Convention Center, Room 9

Thorsten Reinsch1, Ernst Albrecht2, Arne Poyda3, Christian Henning2 and Friedhelm Taube1, (1)Grass and Forage Science / Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
(2)Agricultural Economics, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
(3)Biogeophysics, University Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Abstract:
In Northern Germany, agricultural production accounts for >30% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions. Of these, more than 40% are derived from the drainage of peatland for their use in intensive dairy agriculture. The most effective mitigation tool for these emissions is an increment of groundwater tables. In the presented study we calculated the effect of a proposed higher groundwater table in a fen area (21.700 ha) in two scenarios (SI: 10 cm and SII: 20 cm groundwater elevation) on GHG emissions and costs of the proposed mitigation tool. Land-use on organic soils in that area is divided into 71% intensive grassland production (GI; 3-4 silage cuts), 24% extensive grassland production (GE; 1-2 silage cuts per year) and 5% of non-use (NU) due to waterlogged soils. Results showed that due to higher groundwater tables GHG emissions were reduced by 9 (SI) and 21 (SII) t CO2-eq / ha / year. The share of land-use for GI, GE and NU in the study area changed to 27/44/29% in SI and 5/22/73% in SII, respectively, thus shifting the dominant management form from intensive grasslands to fallow. The economic loss for dairy farms was estimated with 115 (SI) and 372 (SII) € / ha / year, being equivalent to costs of 11.9 (SI) and 16.7 (SII) € / t CO2eq / year. We conclude that the proposed groundwater elevation would considerably reduce the GHG emissions from the agricultural sector by 9–20% in the state. Economic costs as result of lower total milk yields expressed in € / t CO2eq savings are lower compared to other mitigation tools. However, costs per farm were not evenly distributed. Small farms classes (<60 ha) are more affected than larger farm classes (>200 ha), which would accelerate the structural change of dairy farms in that area.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Integrated-Crop Livestock System Oral

<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract